profnachos
07-10-2006, 11:19 PM
I tried to engage a fundamentalist blogger (yeah, there I go again) whose full time job is attacking all things outside of fundamentalism.
Why do I do this? Voyager made an excellent observation below. You can leave fundamentalism, but fundamentalism won't leave you. It is akin to what my Hispanic friends have told me. You can leave the barrio, but you can't take the barrio out of you.
I am still tempted to think I missed out on what fundamentalism really has to offer. It seems to work for a lot of people*, so how about me? I know. It defies logic. Think of my addiction to fundamentalist blogs as addictions to alcohol, porn, etc, and you will see the similarities. :eek:
Okay, so I tried to engage this blogger, but he flat out refused to do so. Why give a voice to every movement, he says? Just because he attacks a group of Christans called X, that does not translate into his obligation to give them a "voice." He won't give Jehovah's Witnesses and the Mormons a voice, and he refuses to discuss with me as well.
(Scripture warning)
Equating me with the Jehovah's Witnesses and Mormons. Great. Then I thought about giving this verse to him from Proverbs 18:2
Fool finds no pleasure in understanding, but delights in airing his own opinions.
But I decided not to. I already know what his response will be.
Here is the contest. What kind of response do you think I have in mind? Because of the utter predictability of fundamentalism, we should all have the same answer. But if you come up with an even better one, I will stand corrected, and I shall forever esteem you.
* During my first preview of this post, this sentense read, "It seems to work a lot of people." I forgot the word "for" between work and a lot. But then, I am thinking that I was speaking the truth when I wrote fundamentalism WORKS a lot of people, not works for.:D :D.
Why do I do this? Voyager made an excellent observation below. You can leave fundamentalism, but fundamentalism won't leave you. It is akin to what my Hispanic friends have told me. You can leave the barrio, but you can't take the barrio out of you.
I am still tempted to think I missed out on what fundamentalism really has to offer. It seems to work for a lot of people*, so how about me? I know. It defies logic. Think of my addiction to fundamentalist blogs as addictions to alcohol, porn, etc, and you will see the similarities. :eek:
Okay, so I tried to engage this blogger, but he flat out refused to do so. Why give a voice to every movement, he says? Just because he attacks a group of Christans called X, that does not translate into his obligation to give them a "voice." He won't give Jehovah's Witnesses and the Mormons a voice, and he refuses to discuss with me as well.
(Scripture warning)
Equating me with the Jehovah's Witnesses and Mormons. Great. Then I thought about giving this verse to him from Proverbs 18:2
Fool finds no pleasure in understanding, but delights in airing his own opinions.
But I decided not to. I already know what his response will be.
Here is the contest. What kind of response do you think I have in mind? Because of the utter predictability of fundamentalism, we should all have the same answer. But if you come up with an even better one, I will stand corrected, and I shall forever esteem you.
* During my first preview of this post, this sentense read, "It seems to work a lot of people." I forgot the word "for" between work and a lot. But then, I am thinking that I was speaking the truth when I wrote fundamentalism WORKS a lot of people, not works for.:D :D.